502 So. 2d 1307 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Briggs Transportation Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. · 456 So. 2d 1175 - Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Young · 476 So. 2d 172 - Mills v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the crime [is] complete for purposes of prosecution.... [t]his does not mean that the crime is complete with regard to the perpetrator's responsibility for acts committed in the furtherance of his crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.