Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 SO2D 446 - State v. Suco

State v. Suco’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2015

6 state decisions

401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States · Bumper v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that an invited guest in a home has a reasonable expectation of privacy while physically in the home at the invitation of the home dweller. 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 11.3(b), at 553 (1978); see Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 149 , 99 S.Ct. 421, 433 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387, 405 (1978); Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.