Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 So. 2d 573 - Fitch v. Prather

502 So. 2d 573 - Fitch v. Prather’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1987
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 394 So. 2d 1189 - Thornhill v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. · 362 So. 2d 561 - Emp. Surplus Line Ins. v. City of Baton Rouge · Ralston Purina Co. v. Pelican State Seed Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A motion for summary judgment cannot be granted unless the pleadings, deposition, answers to interrogatories, admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue of material fact, and mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ... A summary judgment is warranted only when reasonable minds must inevitably conclude the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the facts before the court. The mover bears the burden of establishing there is not a genuine issue of material fact in dispute, and any doubt is resolved against the granting of summary judgment and in favor of a trial on the merits to resolve disputed facts.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.