Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 SW2D 416 - Beard v. Jackson

Beard v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2012

21 state decisions

8019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of St. Joseph v. Hankinson · State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Craig · Wells v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company · 47 Ill. App. 2d 453 - Wert v. Burke · 120 Ga. App. 762 - Farr v. Farr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Having established that Transit had the right to intervene, the next question is what may Transit do to protect its interests which were previously unprotected by a defaulting party—a judgment against whom is binding by collateral estoppel against Transit in a subsequent action as to issues determined in the first case. Plaintiff argues that Transit was improperly allowed to raise defenses which defendant Jackson had not raised. This argument mistakes the basic scope of intervention. While it is true that an intervenor must accept the action pending as he finds it at the time of intervention his rights thereafter are as broad as those of any other parties to the action. Having been permitted to become a party in order to better protect his interest, an intervenor is allowed to set up his own affirmative cause or defense appropriate to the case and his intervention."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.