Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 SW2D 699 - Lewis v. State

Lewis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2008

18 state decisions

1101973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Elliott Et Ux. v. State · 84 N.J. Super. 427 - State v. Scanlon · 97 Okla. Crim. 299 - Brinegar v. State · Ochoa v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An ‘officer should be permitted to take every reasonable precaution to safeguard his life in the process of making an arrest.’ State v. Riley, 240 Or. 521 , 402 P.2d 741, 743 (1965); Wallace v. State, 467 S.W.2d 608, 610 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). All searches incidental to arrest cannot be justified on this theory, for to do so would allow wholesale fishing expeditions whenever a legal arrest is made. United States v. Tate, [D.C.], 209 F.Supp. 762 (1962). See also Adair v. State, 427 S.W.2d 67, 75 (Tex.Cr.App.1968) (dissenting opinion). If, however, from the totality of the circumstances presented to the officer he has reasonable grounds to believe that he is in danger of bodily harm or injury or that the person he encounters is armed or dangerous, justification for a search for weapons exists. Brinegar v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 299 , 262 P.2d 464 (1953); State v. Scanlon, 84 N.J.Super. 427 , 202 A.2d 448 (1964); Elliott v. State, 173 Tenn. 203 , 116 S.W.2d 1009 (1938).” Id. at 702.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.