¶1ORDER
¶2William Owens (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.
¶3The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).