Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 U.S. 346 - White v. Illinois

White v. Illinois’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

2,142
cited by 2,142 later decisions
22
cited 22 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

462 federal appellate · 72 district · 1,259 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,142 later decisions (22 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2025 · most notably Crawford v. Washington (2004), Davis v. Washington (2006)

462 federal appellate · 72 district · 1,259 state decisions — followed in 46 states

1.1k01992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Bourjaily v. United States

Cited together with Ohio v. Roberts · Idaho v. Wright · Crawford v. Washington · California v. Green · United States v. Inadi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Roberts stands for the proposition that unavailability analysis is a necessary part of the Confrontation Clause inquiry only when the challenged out-of-court statements were made in the course of a prior judicial proceeding.”
    88 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “extrajudicial statements . . . contained in formalized testimonial materials, such as affidavits, depositions, prior testimony, or confessions,”
    34 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
    25 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.