In re Baker’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 1115 (§ 321 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1123 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Toibb v. Radloff · Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research v. United States · Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A. · Proudfoot Consulting Co. v. Gordon (In Re Gordon) · Schlehuber v. Fremont National Bank & Trust Co. (In re Schlehuber)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]n request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing, the court may convert a case under this chapter to a case under chapter 11 of this title at any time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Cook“'an important and relevant consideration' under § 706(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Cook
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.