In the Matter of Ultra Precision Industries, Inc., a California Corporation, Bankrupt (Two Cases). National Acceptance Company of California v. Community Bank, National Acceptance Company of California v. Wolf MacHinery Company’s Empirical Analysis
503 F.2d 414 · 1974
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2009
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Automated Bookbinding Services, Inc., Bankrupt. Finance Company of America v. Hans Mueller Corporation · Brodie Hotel Supply, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(D) A purchase money security interest in collateral other than inventory has priority over a conflicting security interest in the same collateral if the purchase money security interest is perfected at the time the debtor receives possession of the collateral or within ten days thereafter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Wolf held no definitive security interest in the machines which could be perfected by the filing of a Financing Statement, and . . . Ultra held no assignable legal interest in the machines which could fall into the grasp of National's after-acquired property security clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“person who owes payment or other performance of the obligation secured,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.