Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 503 F.2d 571 - United States v. Chase

United States v. Chase’s Empirical Analysis

503 F.2d 571 · 1974

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
4
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably United States v. Kenny (1981), United States v. Dubrofsky (1978)

41 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

23019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 952

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Shoup Voting Machine Corp. v. Datamedia Computer Service, Inc. · Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist · Dyer v. MacDougall · Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e simply cannot say that the mere removal of a boot is the type of 'serious invasion of privacy' which the real suspicion standard, applicable to strip searches, was designed to limit.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]t is like one removing an overcoat or a suit jacket--relatively innocuous.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Disbelief of a defendant's own testimony may provide at least a partial basis for a jury's conclusion that the opposite of the testimony is the truth.... But such belief can provide only partial support: there must also be 'other objective evidence on the record which buttresses the fact finder's drawing of the opposite inference.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.