Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 503 F.2d 625 - Hertzka & Knowles v. National Labor Relations Board

Hertzka & Knowles v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

503 F.2d 625 · 1974

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably Barthelemy v. Air Lines Pilots Ass'n (1990), National Labor Relations Board v. Fort Vancouver Plywood Co. (1979)

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

12019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co. · Boire v. Greyhound Corp. · American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board · Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers · Surprenant Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Literally ... almost any form of employer cooperation, however innocuous, could be deemed “support” or “interference.” Yet such a myopic view of § 8(a)(2) would undermine its very purpose and the purpose of the Act as a whole—fostering free choice—because it might prevent the establishment of a system the employees desired.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Sec. 8(a)(2) issue from the subjective standpoint of the employees”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “expressing of any views, argument, or opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.