Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 503 F.2d 899 - J. B. Taylor v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent

J. B. Taylor v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent’s Empirical Analysis

503 F.2d 899 · 1974

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 1990
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1990 · most notably Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society (1975), 23 Cal. 3d 917 - Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los Angeles (1979)

34 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

410197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Goldberg v. Kelly · Hans v. State of Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(t)he fact that some justices of the Supreme Court may feel that a summary affirmance carries less weight With them than an argued case decided by full opinion and hence is easier For them to overrule, gives this court no right or power to overrule or disregard any decision of the United States Supreme Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “elected state officials sued in their official capacity . . . was tantamount to the award of a money judgment against the State of Alabama in direct violation of the doctrine of sovereign immunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is necessary that a Court state its reasons for granting or denying attorneys' fees, in order that the Court's action can be properly reviewed on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.