Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 503 F.3d 1006 - Brown v. Ornoski

Brown v. Ornoski’s Empirical Analysis

503 F.3d 1006 · 2007

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Detrich v. Ryan (2013), Hurles v. Ryan (2014)

24 federal appellate · 1 district ·

450200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Williams v. Taylor · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Furman v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The trial court properly instructed the jury to disregard any extraneous comments and to decide the case based only on the evidence at trial; juries are presumed to follow the court’s instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.