Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 503 F.3d 714 - Carraher v. Target Corp.

Carraher v. Target Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

503 F.3d 714 · 2007

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 37 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Koon v. United States · United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.