Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 503 P2D 909 - Haney v. State

Haney v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
January 1987
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hayes v. State · Bald Eagle v. State of Oklahoma · Walters v. State · Davis v. State · Daney v. State of Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . Inasmuch as we have found the first three assignments of error to be without merit, it follows that the fourth assignment is similarly without merit.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . [W]e note the only difference between the first amended and the second amended Information is a more particular description of the premises which was alleged to have been burglarized. Appellant’s argument that he was-unable to defend inasmuch as he could not tell the place he was accused of burglarizing can hardly be said to be one of substance inasmuch as he must have had knowledge of the location involved at the preliminary hearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.