Haney v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
January 1987
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hayes v. State · Bald Eagle v. State of Oklahoma · Walters v. State · Davis v. State · Daney v. State of Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . Inasmuch as we have found the first three assignments of error to be without merit, it follows that the fourth assignment is similarly without merit.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““. . . [W]e note the only difference between the first amended and the second amended Information is a more particular description of the premises which was alleged to have been burglarized. Appellant’s argument that he was-unable to defend inasmuch as he could not tell the place he was accused of burglarizing can hardly be said to be one of substance inasmuch as he must have had knowledge of the location involved at the preliminary hearing.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tate v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.