¶1We affirm appellant's conviction but vacate his sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing. We believe the trial court erred in assessing points against appellant with reference to his prior failure to appear for a hearing in traffic court, and also for assessing points for previous un-counseled convictions without determining whether counsel had been properly waived in those cases. See Pilla v. State, 477 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
503 So. 2d 1000
503 So.2d 1000
12 Fla.L.Weekly 812
Fretwell v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 18, 1987
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-03-18
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1987
1 state decisions
Relies on 477 So. 2d 1088 - Pilla v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1987-03-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →