503 So. 2d 1342 - Hester v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 475 So. 2d 1218 - Hendrix v. State · 498 So. 2d 863 - Whitehead v. State · 500 So. 2d 134 - Keys v. State · 476 So. 2d 1262 - Linehan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IS THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE STILL OPERATIVE FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTENDING THE PER MISSIBLE MAXIMUM PENALTY AND IMPOSING A DEPARTURE SENTENCE BEYOND THE GUIDELINES?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“1. As set forth by separate Order, the Defendant has been declared a habitual offender by this Court. 2. The Defendant is a career criminal and is non-rehabilitative. The Defendant's criminal history contained in the presentence investigation report indicates an escalated pattern of criminality since 1973. The Defendant is currently 24 years old, which indicates prior criminal activity since age 12 years, and continues through the current offenses by which he stands convicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hester v. State“"We find that this escalation from crimes against property to violent crimes against persons is a clear and convincing reason for departure... ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.