¶1In this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, appellant contends we should grant relief because the trial court, based solely on a finding that appellant violated his probation, bumped his recommended guidelines sentence up more than one cell. His failure to seek appellate review of such an error precluded the trial court from consideration of the issue. Affirmed. Rowe v. State, 496 So.2d 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
503 So. 2d 449
503 So.2d 449
12 Fla.L.Weekly 721
Hair v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 4, 1987
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-03-04
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1997
2 state decisions
Relies on 496 So. 2d 857 - Rowe v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1987-03-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →