503 So. 2d 932
503 So.2d 932
12 Fla.L.Weekly 556
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 17, 1987
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-02-17
Relies on 490 So. 2d 159 - Stabinski, Funt & De Oliveira, PA v. Alvarez · Richmond v. Lumb
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1987-02-17
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2015
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Appellee’s filing of a counterclaim fulfilled the contractual provision that entitled the seller to recover attorney’s fees if she were compelled to take “legal action to enforce” the contract. See Richmond v. Lumb, 339 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. See Stabinski, Funt & De Oliveira, P.A. v. Alvarez, 490 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
¶2Affirmed.