Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 503 SW2D 529 - Ex Parte Arnold

Ex Parte Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2011

13 state decisions

4019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Perales v. State · Ex Parte Hardin · Ex parte Ratliff · Ex Parte Elmore · Ex Parte Ratliff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The power to punish for contempt should only be exercised with caution ... also, contempt is not to be presumed, but on the contrary is presumed not to exist. Ex parte Elmore [ 161 Tex. 585 ], 342 S.W.2d 558 . “The burden of proof in a contempt proceeding is ‘beyond a reasonable doubt.’ Ex parte Cragg [ 133 Tex.Cr.R. 118 ], 109 S.W.2d 479 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.