McCray v. McGee’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2016
1 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Botany Worsted Mills v. United States · Duobond Corp. v. Congress Factors Corp. · 335 So. 2d 815 - Thayer v. State · 177 N.J. Super. 87 - Shapiro v. Essex Cty. Freeholders Bd. · Elliott v. Roach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because there is an inference that all omissions should be understood as exclusions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Congress, by failing to mention crossclaims in section 16-3904, must be presumed to have consciously excluded cross-claims from that section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re MMD“when a legislature makes express mention of one thing, the exclusion of others is implied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re MMD
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.