Grady v. Grady’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2020
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hume v. United States · Taylor-Edwards Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc. · Harrigan v. Harrigan · Mulry v. Mulry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... a court w[ill] usually refuse to enforce a contract on the ground of uncon-scionability only when the inequality of the bargain was so manifest as to shock the judgment of a person of good sense and when the terms were so unreasonable that ‘no man in his senses and not under delusion, would make on the one hand, and as no honest and fair man would accept on the other’ ...”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.