Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 F.2d 213 - United States v. Douglas

United States v. Douglas’s Empirical Analysis

504 F.2d 213 · 1974

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1976
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Morrissey v. Brewer · United States v. Marion · Boddie v. Connecticut · Smith v. Hooey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Operating in a field where the only possible remedy is ‘the draconian remedy of dismissal of the indictment,’ we have been reluctant to find that an accused’s right to a speedy trial has been violated absent a credible showing that he has been substantially prejudiced by the delay.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.