Mower v. Britton’s Empirical Analysis
504 F.2d 396 · 1974
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Ng Kam Fook v. P a Esperdy · Hyser v. Reed · United States ex rel. Johnson v. Chairman of New York State Board of Parole
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“With respect to the process that is due in this situation, we agree with the opinion of the court in King v. United States, 492 F.2d 1337 , 1343, (7th Cir. 1974) that a 'substantial argument can be made that some modicum of due process should attend the denial of the expectation of conditional freedom on parole inasmuch as its termination after having been granted indicates a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““In view of the large number of parole applications made annually to a Board of limited staff and the lack of any indication of bad faith in the interpretation and administration of the applicable law and regulations, however, our decision will not be applied retroactively.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Beard v. Johnston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.