Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad’s Empirical Analysis
504 F.2d 453 · 1974
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Ellis v. Interstate Commerce Commission · 355 F. Supp. 700 - Pacific Fruit Express Co. v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad · Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Soo Line Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are satisfied that these decisions do not indicate any belief by the Commission that Section 1(14)(b) requires approval of protective service contracts between common carriers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.