Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 F.2d 595 - Plano v. Baker

Plano v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

504 F.2d 595 · 1974

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
4
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently February 2008 · most notably Pet v. Department of Health Services (1988), Barbara v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (1996)

31 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

4201974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Perry v. Sindermann · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Steffel v. Thompson · Samuels v. J Mackell Fernandez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we have not required exhaustion of state judicial or administrative remedies . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a boilerplate claim for damages will not automatically render the administrative remedy inadequate. Where the relief claimed is the only factor that militates against the application of the exhaustion requirement, the complaint should be carefully scrutinized to ensure that the claim for relief was not inserted for the sole purpose of avoiding the exhaustion rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"Since under Section 1983 an individual seeks to preserve or vindicate federally guaranteed rights, a strong national interest in protecting those rights makes it incumbent upon the federal courts to avoid erecting barriers to prosecution of such suits in federal tribunals."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.