Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 F.3d 1249 - In re Translogic Technology, Inc.

In re Translogic Technology, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

504 F.3d 1249 · 2007

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
March 2020
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. (2008), Scanner Technologies Corp. v. Icos Vision Systems Corporation N.V. (2008)

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

140200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 103

Relies on MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al. · KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. · Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. · Phillips v. AWH Corp. · Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the best practices for claim construction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.