Acosta v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
504 F.3d 1323 · 2007
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Scott v. Harris · Miller v. Gammie · Monroe v. City of Phoenix · Bibo Inc Monumental Life Insurance Company v. Bibo Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]here is no special Fourth Amendment standard for unconstitutional deadly force.”). . At the hearing on the motions, there was some discussion as to what in particular is meant by”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.