In re Buszard’s Empirical Analysis
504 F.3d 1364 · 2007
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2023
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Phillips v. AWH Corp. · Dickinson v. Zurko · In re Gartside · In re Paulsen · In Re Yamamoto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. In re Skvorecz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.