Burdick v. Quarterman’s Empirical Analysis
504 F.3d 545 · 2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Townsend v. Sain · Marshall v. Lonberger · Specht v. Patterson · Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc. v. Blankenship
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The record shows that counsel for [defendant] conferred with him ... and discussed the possible sentences.... Even if we accept [defendant’s] allegation that the Court failed to advise him specifically of all of the rights he waived in pleading guilty, that failure does not of itself render the plea involuntary.”). 11 . Burdick, 504 F.3d at 547 . We are not alone among circuits in this view. See, e.g., Pardue v. Burton, 26 F.3d 1093 , 1096 (11th Cir.1994) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burton v. Terrell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.