Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 N.W.2d 252 - State v. Tuttle

State v. Tuttle’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Cermak · Joon Kyu Kim v. State · State v. Knight · State v. Gerdes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here, as here, the sentence is an essential element of the agreement, there is no basis on which to withdraw the plea if the district court's sentence is in accordance with the plea agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the negotiated agreement was that Tuttle would not be allowed to withdraw his plea if found unamenable to treatment; rather he would receive a sentencing guidelines presumptive sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “with an agreement that he would receive a stayed sentence if he was found amenable to treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.