Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 N.W.2d 336 - State v. Crow

State v. Crow’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tollett v. Henderson · State v. Winckler · Timmerman v. Timmerman · State v. Grosh · State v. Spotted Horse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a criminal defendant has solemnly admitted in open court that he is in fact guilty of the offense with which he is charged, he may not thereafter raise independent claims relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea. He may only attack the voluntary and intelligent character of the gufity plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.