Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 NW2D 758 - Fabio v. Bellomo

Fabio v. Bellomo’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

422
cited by 422 later decisions
7
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 418 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 422 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc. (2009), Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp. (2009)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 418 state decisions

22501993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Kubrick · Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin · Grondahl v. Bulluck · Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 422 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion for summary judgment shall be granted when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that either party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, the reviewing court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was granted.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he reviewing court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was granted.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) whether there is a relationship between physician and patient with regard to the illness; (2) whether the physician is attending and examining the patient; and (3) whether there is something more to be done.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.