Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 P2D 1077 - Soppe v. Breed

Soppe v. Breed’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2006

9 state decisions

401973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ryan v. United States · North American Uranium, Inc. v. Johnston · Long v. Forbes · Bushnell v. Elkins · Lester A. York v. John P. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... limitations imposed by the parol evidence rule are directed at a showing which would contradict, vary, or alter the terms of the instrument ..." Citing Parkinson v. Roberts, 78 Wyo. 478 , 329 P.2d 823, 826 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.