Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 P2D 1359 - Nichols v. Eckert

Nichols v. Eckert’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
4
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably McGinnis v. Stevens (1975), Wertz v. Southern Cloud Unified School District 334 (1975)

45 state decisions

17019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Goldberg v. Kelly · Perry v. Sindermann · Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath · United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” U.S.Const. amend. XIV, § 1 provides in part: “No state shall . . . deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law . . . .””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'For [the due process] clause to apply there must be state action and the deprivation, of an individual interest of sufficient importance to warrant constitutional protection.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e conclude that appellants must be given the opportunity to present their own defense by testimony and other evidence.... A full judicial hearing is not necessary....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.