Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 P2D 831 - Kingery v. Chapple

Kingery v. Chapple’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
10
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Ravin v. State (1975), State v. Erickson (1978)

33 state decisions — followed in 10 states

13019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 23 U.S.C. § 402

Relies on Maxwell v. Bishop · Kelly v. Zamarello · Everhardt v. City of New Orleans · 42 Wis. 2d 42 - Bisenius v. Karns · Love v. Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wjhere an administrative. regulation has been adopted in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act, and it appears that the legislature has intended to commit to the agency discretion as to the particular matter that forms the subject of the regulation, we will review the regulation in the following manner: First, we will ascertain whether the regulation is consistent with and reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of the statutory provisions conferring rule-making authority on the agency. This aspect of review insures that the agency has' not exceeded the power delegated by the legislature. Second, we will determine whether the regulation is reasonable and not arbitrary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) The filing of a certified copy of a regulation or an order of repeal by the lieutenant governor raises the rebuttable presumptions that ... (3) all requirements of this chapter and the regulations relative to the regulation have been complied with; . ..”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.