Jones v. Hatchett’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably 654 So. 2d 1122 - Terrain Enterprises, Inc. v. Mockbee (1995), 838 So. 2d 948 - Haggerty v. Foster (2002)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Planters Wholesale Grocery v. Kincade · Hill v. Dunaway · 474 So. 2d 584 - South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. Aden · Bryan Bros. Packing Co. v. Grubbs · Rhodes v. Fullilove
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(f) Supplementation of Responses. A party who has responded to a request for discovery with a response that was complete when made is under no duty to supplement his response to include information thereafter acquired, except as follows: (1) A party is under a duty seasonably to supplement his response with respect to any question directly addressed to (A) the identity and location of persons (i) having knowledge of discoverable matters, or (ii) who may be called as witnesses at the trial, and (B) the identity of each person expected to be called as an expert witness at trial, the subject matter on which he is expected to testify, and the substance of his testimony. (2) A party is under a duty seasonably to amend a prior response if he obtains information upon the basis of which (A) he knows that the response was incorrect when made, or (B) he knows that the response though correct when made is no longer true and the circumstances are such that a failure to amend the response is in substance a knowing concealment.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he very purpose of our civil discovery procedures is to prevent such trial by ambush”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“instructions on a driver's duty to drive at a speed sufficiently slow to enable him to stop within his range of vision `should not be interpreted or applied to impose on a driver an absolute duty to avoid a collision.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.