Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 So. 2d 373 - Kent v. State

504 So. 2d 373 - Kent v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2008

10 state decisions

50198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · 361 So. 2d 1106 - Chavers v. State · 475 So. 2d 623 - Ex Parte Stork · Donahay v. State · 348 So. 2d 1092 - Arnold v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(a) A person commits the crime of robbery in the third degree if in the course of committing a theft he: "(1) Uses force against the person of the owner or any person present with intent to overcome his physical resistance or physical power of resistance; or "(2) Threatens the imminent use of force against the person of the owner or any person present with intent to compel acquiescence to the taking of or escaping with the property."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"(a) A person commits the crime of robbery in the first degree if he violates Section 13A-8-43 and he: "(1) Is armed with a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the State does not have to prove that the defendant actually had a gun in order to sustain a conviction of first degree robbery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.