504 So. 2d 396 - Keen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently November 2011 · most notably 596 So. 2d 957 - Traylor v. State (1992), 743 So. 2d 1 - Ruiz v. State (1999)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 7
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Moran v. Burbine · Oregon v. Kennedy · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen a defendant has been advised of his rights and makes an otherwise voluntary statement, the delay in following the strictures of [rule 3.130] must be shown to have induced the confession.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Keen v. State · Stephens v. State“In our view, the misconduct sub judice was engaged in by the prosecutor in the heat of trial in order to win his case, and was not done intentionally to afford the state `a more favorable opportunity to convict the defendant.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We find no double jeopardy problem with a retrial of Keen arising from the prosecutorial misconduct here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.