¶1Affirmed. See Carlile v. Game & Fresh Water Fish Comm’n, 354 So.2d 362 (Fla.1977); Mills Dev. Corp. v. Shipp & Head, Inc., 126 Fla. 490, 171 So. 533 (1936), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 658, 59 S.Ct. 359, 83 L.Ed. 426 (1939); Apalachicola N.R. v. Sommers, 79 Fla. 816, 85 So. 361 (1920); Sand Key Assoc. Ltd. v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, 458 So.2d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), review pending, No. 66,372 (Fla.1986); Fleischman v. Department of Professional Regulation, 441 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review denied, 451 So.2d 847 (Fla.1984); Insurance Management, Inc. v. McLeod, 194 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).
504 So. 2d 464
Cary v. Wolfson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 10, 1987
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-03-10
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1988
4 state decisions
Relies on 451 So. 2d 844 - State v. Hogan · 354 So. 2d 362 - Carlile v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COM'N · Apalachicola Northern Railroad Co. v. Sommers
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1987-03-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →