¶1ORDER
¶2Devonta Latehison appeals from his conviction of both robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. We affirm.-
¶3The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, and the trial court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have ho precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).