Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 U.S. 127 - Riggins v. Nevada

Riggins v. Nevada’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

1,075
cited by 1,075 later decisions
9
cited 9 times by the Supreme Court
39
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

306 federal appellate · 78 district · 402 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,075 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2026 · most notably Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. P Casey P Casey (1992), Godinez v. Moran (1993)

306 federal appellate · 78 district · 402 state decisions — followed in 39 states

49001992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Faretta v. California · Bell v. Wolfish · Ohio v. Roberts · Arizona v. Fulminante

Cited together with Washington v. Harper · Sell v. United States · Strickland v. Washington · Drope v. Missouri · Pate v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,075 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Competence to stand trial is rudimentary, for upon it depends the main part of those rights deemed essential to a fair trial, including the right to effective assistance of counsel, the rights to summon, to confront, and to cross-examine witnesses, and the right to testify on one’s own behalf or to remain silent without penalty for doing so.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “absent a finding of overriding justification and a determination of medical appropriateness.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “By administering medication, the State may be creating a prejudicial negative demeanor in the defendant--making him look nervous and restless, for example, or so calm or sedated as to appear bored, cold, unfeeling, and unresponsive....”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.