Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 504 U.S. 428 - Burdick v. Takushi

Burdick v. Takushi’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

2,152
cited by 2,152 later decisions
32
cited 32 times by the Supreme Court
39
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

582 federal appellate · 267 district · 389 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,152 later decisions (32 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party (2008)

582 federal appellate · 267 district · 389 state decisions — followed in 39 states

92301992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Reynolds v. Sims · Williams v. Rhodes · Anderson v. Celebrezze · Storer v. Brown

Cited together with Anderson v. Celebrezze · Storer v. Brown · Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party · Norman v. Reed Cook County Officers Electoral Board · Williams v. Rhodes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,152 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the character and magnitude of the asserted injury to the rights protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments that the plaintiff seeks to vindicate”
    258 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the extent to which those interests make it necessary to burden the plaintiff's rights.”
    41 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “narrowly drawn to advance a state interest of compelling importance.”
    33 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.