Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 A2D 1326 - Gilbert v. State

Gilbert v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2004

1 district · 4 state decisions

20198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · LaFleur Ex Rel. Anderson v. Frost · Hamilton v. Portland Pier Site District · Boston v. Black · Mottram v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The Governor] shall have power to remit after conviction all forfeitures and penalties, and to grant reprieves, commutations and pardons, except in cases of impeachment, upon such conditions, and with such restrictions and limitations as may be deemed proper, subject to such regulations as may be provided by law, relative to the manner of applying for pardons. Such power to grant reprieves, commutations and pardons shall include offenses of juvenile delinquency.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Once the parole board discharges a lifer, he is no longer subject to any of the conditions that attach to parole; he becomes a totally free man. If applied to Gilbert, who was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment before the 1959 amendments took effect, the ten-year discharge provision would act to release him completely from his sentence, which when imposed in 1951 was by law to terminate only on his death. Like the "good time" law in Bossie [ v. State, 488 A.2d 477 (Me. 1985)] therefore, the discharge provision would act as a commutation of Gilbert's sentence... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.