In re Walker’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Miller v. Johnson · Schwab v. Reilly · Rousey v. Jacoway · Bernard v. Coyne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The debtor has a right to amend his schedule of exemptions up to the close of the case; if he does and there is a change in a claim of exemption or another exemption claim is added, the creditor will have another 30 days from the date of that amendment to object to the new exemption claim.... [This interpretation] gives a creditor its one chance to object to a claim of exemption. The later date for objections is there to provide an opportunity to creditors to object to exemptions regardless of when the exemption is claimed. Such an interpretation allows courts to grant a debtor’s request to amend under Rule 1009 without denying a creditor its right to object to a previously unclaimed exemption.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Reeves
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.