Armco Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America’s Empirical Analysis
505 F.2d 1129 · 1974
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Local 174 Teamsters Chaukfeurs Warehousemen Helpers of America v. Lucas Flour Company · Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 · Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader · Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no allegation or contention that the strike of the unions involved, however illegal it may have been, was for the purpose of restraining commercial competition in the marketing of goods or services, or that it had operated to restrain commercial competition in some substantial way. There was accordingly no cause of action stated under the Sherman Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1971”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.