Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 F.2d 1233 - United States v. Hendrix

United States v. Hendrix’s Empirical Analysis

505 F.2d 1233 · 1974

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2006 · most notably United States v. Grayson (1978), Roberts v. United States (1980)

51 federal appellate · 26 state decisions — followed in 15 states

4201974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. People of State of New York · United States v. Tucker · Townsend v. Burke · Gore v. United States · Difronzo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`Prior convictions may cause a heavier sentence, though the defendant has already "paid" for them. A general course of dissolute, irresponsible, shiftless, or dangerous behavior may be deemed to call for longer incarceration though none of its components are, strictly, "crimes."'"”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Without denying that the point has substance, we may say that it is not wholly evil to discourage defendants from taking the stand to lie.” (United States v. Hendrix (1974), 505 F.2d 1233, 1236 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.