Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 F.2d 287 - Evans v. Wright

Evans v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

505 F.2d 287 · 1974

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
February 1988
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Quercia v. United States · Capital Traction Co. v. Hof · Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co. · United States v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad · Doyle v. Union Pac Ry Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n a trial by jury in a federal court, the judge is not a mere moderator, but is the governor of the trial for the purpose of assuring its proper conduct and of determining questions of law. In charging the jury, the trial judge is not limited to instructions of an abstract sort. It is within his province, whenever he thinks it necessary, to assist the jury in arriving at a just conclusion by explaining and commenting upon the evidence, by drawing their attention to the parts of it which he thinks important; and he may express his opinion upon the facts, provided he makes it clear to the jury that all matters of fact are submitted to their determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.