Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 F.2d 785 - Lewis v. Varnes

Lewis v. Varnes’s Empirical Analysis

505 F.2d 785 · 1974

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
December 2002
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2002 · most notably 431 F. Supp. 1080 - Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors (1977), Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp. (1981)

12 federal appellate ·

1601974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blau v. Lehman · Kern County Land Company v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation · Reliance Electric Company v. Emerson Electric Company · Smolowe v. Delendo Corp. · Garrison v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The courts, however, are free to adopt such a flexible approach in construing § 16(b) only in those cases where the relevant provision is either intrinsically ambiguous or in which there are alternative plausible applications of the provision to a particular fact situation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is an objective rule and does not reach every transaction in which an investor actually relies on inside information, or in which the potential for such reliance is great.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(f)or the purposes of § 16(b) . . . an 'insider' is one who is required to report his transactions under § 16(a),”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.