Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 F.2d 794 - Brooks Woodington Inc Carncross Schroeder Stein Williams Young Company

Brooks Woodington Inc Carncross Schroeder Stein Williams Young Company’s Empirical Analysis

505 F.2d 794 · 1974

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2003

1 district · 1 state decisions

501974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jacobowitz v. Double Seven Corp. · Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Caldwell · Killoren v. Boyd, Cronk & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[o]ur own examination of bankruptcy law has reflected no authority precisely in point. We find help, however, in the analogous situation of the allowance of interest on claims filed in bankrupt-cy_ Even though the claim is interest-bearing, ‘to cope in the most convenient and equitable manner with the debtor’s apparent insolvency,’ the ‘law selects as decisive the date of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy,’ and ‘disregards, for the purpose of liquidation, interest accruing beyond that date.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a different situation might exist if the estate were solvent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.